ACTIVISTS UPDATE: Posted Wednesday, October 12, 2016, 2:00 A.M.

Today is Fluoride Free Austin's 8th birthday. With elections less than a month away, most Austinites' eyes are trained on the contentious Clinton vs Trump race for the White House. Absent any large-scale media-coordinated smear campaigns such as happened in 2014, the races of the five Council members up for re-election are considerably less interesting, though the near-concurrent departures of Code Compliance chief Carl Smart, City Manager Marc Ott, and several lesser lights have enlivened the season and left the City's administration in flux. We look forward to seeing what emerges when the dust settles. And whatever happens, whatever our strategy for the New Year, we'll be back.

A Citizens Communication signup schedule for the rest of the year is found below.'

City Council 2016 Citizens Communication Schedule

Fluoride Free Austin LogoLaura Pressley, Ph.D. recently filed her landmark appeal and final legal brief in her historic election challenge to Travis County's elections process. Oral argument took place on April 27th in the Third Court of Appeals, Travis County, and a decision is expected within a month. The outcome will affect the integrity of elections Texas-wide.



Survey Screenshot This page was last updated during a period of optimism: a time of hope that the still-new 10-1 City Council, elected by districts, would have a stronger connection with the average Austinite’s concerns than prior at-large Councils: would make decisions in the interests of constituents rather than out of political considerations. Regrettably, that hasn’t happened. City government is as politically-driven as ever and the Council members, Don Zimmerman excepted, seem as entrenched in appeasing the special interests that have ruled Austin for years as those they replaced. Nor has the committee system, touted as a quicker route of citizen access to the Council’s attention, fulfilled its promise.

Last summer, we gained firsthand experience of that failure. In June, Councilman Zimmerman, vice-chair of the Public Utilities Committee, decided, in the absence on maternity leave of chair Delia Garza, to bring the fluoridation issue to PUC’s agenda at its June 17 meeting. Two city staffers: Ruth Jane Burazer, the Water Utility’s regular apologist and Janet Pichette, Health and Human Services’ chief epidemiologist represented the fluoride cheerleaders. Two local biologic dentists, Dr. Griffin Cole and Dr. Joan Sefcik, gave the anti-fluoride professionals’ side. Discussion among the three Committee members present was thoughtful and intelligent, but in the end Zimmerman could not get a second to his motion to bring fluoridation before the full City Council. Instead, members Ellen Troxclair and Ann Kitchen—both newcomers to the issue—expressed a need for more time to study into it and the meeting adjourned without a vote taken.

PUC did not meet in July. In August, Delia Garza returned as chair determined to assert control. She arranged for an August 19 joint meeting of PUC and the Public Health and Human Services Committee (PHHSC) chaired by Ora Houston, to kill the matter once and for all. Significantly, Troxclair and Garza herself are members of both committees; Kathie Tovo, potentially the only new face, was a no-show. The format Garza set up was carefully pre-scripted to shut off all serious discussion and preserve the status quo. Declaring that she wanted no “back and forth” (the essence of debate), she assigned a strict 15-minute time limit to presenters on both sides, plus three 3-minute slots for two pro- and two con-F citizens communication speakers. Dr. Philip Huang, Austin/Travis County Health and Human Services Department medical “authority”, the first speaker, opened with his favorite and foundational lie: an assertion that the highly toxic fluorosilicic acid put into water is identical to natural (calcium) fluoride, and fluoridation simply an “upward adjustment” of an already-occurring natural substance. This statement provided an instant pretext for all the committee members save Zimmerman to avoid a political hot potato. Armed with the medical officer’s permission to vote for continued fluoridation they completely ignored all opposition input, turning a deaf ear to information from two prominent dentists and a pharmacist, and treating a distinguished LULAC leader with palpable coldness. Neither of the “opportunity district” beneficiaries—Houston and Garza—showed the slightest interest in knowing that fluoride’s toxicity disproportionately impacts communities of color. In the end, Zimmerman was unable to secure a second to his motion for Council-wide consideration and the issue died in committee—for the time being.

The entire meeting can be viewed on this page and is well worth watching in its entirety. For those who crave shorter clips, there are some interesting takeaways:

DELIA GARZA believes she has the right to force every single family in Austin to drink fluoridated water (or at least pay for it) because she can’t get every single family in Austin to brush with fluoridated toothpaste.

ORA HOUSTON thinks fluoridated water is the best use of dollars in a district with 6,000 hungry children because with without it “they would have more cavities than they already do.” (how many that might be we didn’t get a chance to ask).

ELLEN TROXCLAIR, who furnishes her office with fluoride-free water at taxpayer expense, uttered not a peep during the proceedings. . .

ANN KITCHEN has absolute, blind faith in the wisdom of the Public Health and Human Services Department burearcracy, something she neglected to mention during the June meeting.

A former Pew operative made a surprise appearance in the guise of simply “an Austin resident and a mother.” STEPHANIE RUBIN, who has since moved on to another, Austin-based paid advocacy position, was comically flustered during her 3-minute citizens communication patter. See to believe!


The Fluoride Follies Blog is up and running again. You can access it from the blog button on this page.

Dallas City Council has decided to censor the playing of film clips during citizens communication in order to cripple organized presentations by the city’s large community of anti-fluoridation activists. On April 27, 18 speakers arrived at City Hall prepared to back up their case through use of expert testimony via short videoclips embedded within their 3-minute talks. The City responded by shutting off the livestream and declared its intent to do so in the future. Will the prohibition apply to future others who wish to speak on subjects that the Council feels an obligation to at least pretend to take seriously? Only time will tell.

October 12, 2016